Recent content by den114

Jack, I concur but when we were covering LT’s, I was assigned to 35 Bn & while working a 9x we had a pull box in a commercial building, just inside the entrance door & ran off. I investigated & told the chauffeur to transmit a 10-92. He did, but once on the rig told me BC Larry Lee doesn’t like...

Yes, automatic 10-18, unless single engine response, then automatically a 10-19.

And dropping down to a 10-18. From what are they dropping down from?

Wondering if 10-92 radio signal has been changed? I have heard a company officer & a chief officer give the following transmission: “10-18 for a 10-92 at box_”. Always thought a 10-92 gave “work” to the 1st Engine & Truck. Self explanatory. ????

Spoke to member & was told FT changed from 149 to 109. 250 there for lithium batteries. Whatever.

109 wound up FT, 149 remained in service. I guess Bn didn’t give All-Hands working, even though 2 lines were stretched. Extra engine & truck not assigned.

Because of Boro Park Hatzolla service, possibly.

See 148 to 169 & heard 109 to 156 & 131 to 172. Interesting, all 3 companies respond to fires in Sunset Park area. 114 only unit left.

224 to 228

Question: If an extra engine & truck are requested, before the all-hands is given, does it negate the 1&1 on the all hands being used, transmission?

Some of yesterday’s “5th” alarm relocations were unbelievable.

Believe 8th Div reported R5 entered bldg, 2nd fl heavy clutter. Correct?

Know why Hdqtrs stopped greater alarms & stopped at a 5th? Anyone? Curious.

Request for 4 more engines. Looks like a 6th alarm the old way.

Relocations above show L15 to 114, then 146 to 114. Not showing those units at 75.