Author Topic: Teleprinters and MDT History?  (Read 2489 times)

Offline QUEENS1985

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Teleprinters and MDT History?
« on: April 28, 2012, 12:00:54 AM »
What year did the teleprinters come out into the FDNY? What about the MDT's? Was it always Starfire?
« Last Edit: April 28, 2012, 05:00:57 PM by truck4 »

Nycfire.net

Teleprinters and MDT History?
« on: April 28, 2012, 12:00:54 AM »

Offline FD347

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • Gender: Male
    • FDNewYork.com
Re: History
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2012, 02:32:30 AM »
Teleprinters are part of Starfire. It was designed in 1975 and installed in Brooklyn first around 1977 with the rest of the city shortly thereafter.

MDT's and FDT's (firehouse data terminals) were experimented with starting around 1992. They went citywide around 1996. FDT's didn't work out and were abandoned.

On a side note to any members here: MDTs have been in the rigs for the better part of 17 years. For 17 years you've been asking us the same thing, "We didn't get the run. Can you resend it?" For 17 years we've been giving you the same answer, "Reset the MDT."

How much more time do you need to figure out how to use the MDT?

Frank Raffa
Supv. Dispatcher, FDNY
www.FDNewYork.com
BCO - RIP
2/22/1923 - 6/3/2008

Offline 68jk09

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2869
  • Gender: Male
Re: History
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2012, 05:29:41 AM »
Frank ...in regards to your post about re-setting the mdt  ......if a Unit has to re-set the mdt to get a run why did they not get it in the first place ?.....a  Unit should not have to drive down the street re-setting the mdt every few blocks.........on the mdt subject...how many times is a Unit told that their mdt shows off.....i never knew anybody who shut their mdt off....not breaking your shoes....just thought you may have some insight on this. 

Offline 69 METS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
Re: History
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2012, 09:27:15 AM »
Frank ...in regards to your post about re-setting the mdt  ......if a Unit has to re-set the mdt to get a run why did they not get it in the first place ?.....a  Unit should not have to drive down the street re-setting the mdt every few blocks.........on the mdt subject...how many times is a Unit told that their mdt shows off.....i never knew anybody who shut their mdt off....not breaking your shoes....just thought you may have some insight on this.

Good points Chief ... I often wondered the same thing.

Offline FD347

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • Gender: Male
    • FDNewYork.com
Re: History
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2012, 10:16:04 AM »
I have no explanation as to why it doesn't work, only that it's been like this since the beginning. I observe the problem to be more frequent in wet weather leading me to believe it's an RF propagation issue. Combine that with the normal occasional packet loss and latency of a digital communications protocol and you have a recipe for failure.

But not to worry for much longer. If and when (in the next 5 years or so) they get the new Intergraph CADS, the entire MDT system will have to be replaced.

In the meanwhile, I suggest going back to basics for a backup: mount a sheet of plexiglass on the dashboard and keep a China marker handy so you can write down the runs on the fly.
Frank Raffa
Supv. Dispatcher, FDNY
www.FDNewYork.com
BCO - RIP
2/22/1923 - 6/3/2008

Offline 69 METS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
Re: History
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2012, 12:17:53 PM »
In the meanwhile, I suggest going back to basics for a backup: mount a sheet of plexiglass on the dashboard and keep a China marker handy so you can write down the runs on the fly.
  A small beat up clipboard with a supply of cut to size slips of scrap paper and a pencil sharpened with a knife, bolted to the dash of a Mack CF ... Slips are transferred to the officer's tie clip as they accumulate. Crude but effective!!!

Offline memory master

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
Re: History
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2012, 02:03:48 PM »
In the meanwhile, I suggest going back to basics for a backup: mount a sheet of plexiglass on the dashboard and keep a China marker handy so you can write down the runs on the fly.
  A small beat up clipboard with a supply of cut to size slips of scrap paper and a pencil sharpened with a knife, bolted to the dash of a Mack CF ... Slips are transferred to the officer's tie clip as they accumulate. Crude but effective!!!
That's a bit of the job that'll never fade away. Tried and true, worked for years and should have been patented! ;D

Offline QUEENS1985

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: History
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2012, 03:35:32 PM »
Did the teleprinters look and work the same way as today? Even the touchscreen?

Offline 68jk09

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2869
  • Gender: Male
Re: History
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2012, 04:15:41 PM »
The original teleprinters were not touch screen ...they had round buttons for the different signals.....also they did not announce ENG   LAD  BN like today....there was no tone at all just a buzzing sound as the carrier moved across the page.....Companies soon developed a variety of devices (usually a microswitch) to sound an alarm when the printer went off.....these devices were forbidden by the Job so they had to be easily removable if the machine broke....this never made sense....it took many years for the Job to integrate an audible alarm into the system.

Offline QUEENS1985

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: History
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2012, 04:46:58 PM »
Interesting history. When did the "beeboo's" that we know today come around?

Offline 811

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
Re: History
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2012, 05:21:01 PM »
The original teleprinters were not touch screen ...they had round buttons for the different signals.....also they did not announce ENG   LAD  BN like today....there was no tone at all just a buzzing sound as the carrier moved across the page.....Companies soon developed a variety of devices (usually a microswitch) to sound an alarm when the printer went off.....these devices were forbidden by the Job so they had to be easily removable if the machine broke....this never made sense....it took many years for the Job to integrate an audible alarm into the system.

The "easily removable" devices were added because a member standing housewatcth became more a piece of ancient history than the horses or steam engines.

Offline FDNY150

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1245
  • Gender: Male
Re: Teleprinters and MDT History?
« Reply #11 on: May 02, 2012, 11:22:55 AM »
The BeeBoop came around some time in the 80's. The old teleprinters used to buzz and make a beeping noise, but the beeping wasn't that loud. I can hear it in my head though.
Step up or Shut up!!!

Offline kidfrmqns

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
Re: Teleprinters and MDT History?
« Reply #12 on: May 02, 2012, 11:34:39 AM »
Before the teleprinters did the house watch have to count bells? Were companies alerted for a run in any other way than "taping out" the box number?

Offline memory master

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
Re: Teleprinters and MDT History?
« Reply #13 on: May 02, 2012, 01:28:29 PM »
Prior to teleprinters and voice alarm the member on housewatch was responsible for "counting" the bells, if necessary turning out the companies affected and logging the "signal received" in the company journal. A journal entry would have looked like...
"12:06  Received alarm by telegraph signal station 456".       or
"12:32  Received alarm by telegraph signal station 654, both companies responded."

Runs would also be received (by the first due companies) when the dispatcher was in receipt of a phone alarm. He would tip off the first due companies with 3 short rings on the Dept. phone, give the housewatch the address and then transmit the box over the bells.

Of course, units that were out of quarters for what ever reason would receive their runs via Dept. radio.
                                                                                 

Offline Disp51

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: Teleprinters and MDT History?
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2012, 02:25:20 PM »
The dispatcher would send the signal twice, with the primary bell (brass), and the secondary bell (steel) so it would be two distinctive sounds. In addition, smaller steel bells would be placed throughout quarters, which would sound during both transmissions. Everyone would count the incoming alarms, and most could tell which boxes were to be run from memory, plus there was always a large board with the first due assignments either in the kitchen and/or sitting room . Also, at the bottom of the telegraph bells at the housewatch was a button to sound the bells throughout the house. This was used at night to supplement the lights to turn out the members, and also to call the members down for meal, chief's visit, etc.
At the borough CO's, the bells would be restricted to the first and second alarm companies late night unless  fire conditions were too busy.

 

anything