Wondering if 10-92 radio signal has been changed? I have heard a company officer & a chief officer give the following transmission: “10-18 for a 10-92 at box_”.
Always thought a 10-92 gave “work” to the 1st Engine & Truck. Self explanatory. ????
109 wound up FT, 149 remained in service. I guess Bn didn’t give All-Hands working, even though 2 lines were stretched. Extra engine & truck not assigned.
I don’t see that in your rundown, maybe somehow missing it. I only see FC reporting fire in cockloft of exposure 4, a detached private dwelling & subsequent report citing exposure 4 likewise.
Maybe Bn initially reported it wrong, but I don’t see it posted & haven’t heard any radio...
According to rundown by HC7, 42Bn transmitted a 2nd alarm & reported fire had extended to exp.4 across the alley. No mention of alley being exp.4, unless missed by HC7.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.