4/10/23 Brooklyn 4th alarm box 2894

Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
9,383
181 Bay 25 Street between Cropsey and Bath Avenues

Heavy fire in a vacant PD

L168: Transmit the 10-75, K. We have smoke in the street.

TL172 FAST

R5 on the BK frequency responding

BC42: Be advised this is a vacant building.

BC42: Give us a 2nd alarm

Designations:

BC58SO, BC48RUL, E159T SAT5

BC42: Fire on 1st and top floors of a 30x50 wood frame NFP. Fire is DWH.

Staging: Bath Avenue @ 21 Avenue

3rd alarm transmitted

DIV8: Roll call has been conducted, 4 exterior lines operating at this time

Exterior operations

DIV8: Transmit a 3rd alarm.

3rd alarm:

E310/243, E224/284, E323/330, E250, E279
L132/L168, TL120/172
BC38, 57staging
MSU1, RAC1

4th alarm:
E332/, E214/, E276, E318
TL159/153, L156
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 2, 2022
Messages
392
Btn.42 Transmitted 2*

Div.8 Transmitted 3* 181 Bay 25 St. Fire Thru-out 3' 30 x 50 PD Under Construction

FC/Div.8 Transmitted 4*

4th: E.332 act *, 214 act*,E.318, TL159 act.153, Lad.156 Btn.35, Car 4H, Car4

22;15 FC: Car 15A Reports Fire Thru-out; Exterior Attack 5 Handlines, 1 TL, 1Ladderpipe; Conditions Remain DWH
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
488
With the additional alarms, expecting fire communicated to exposures, but no mention in progress report. Fortunately.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
488
I know the transmitted technical exposures, but the Queen Anne‘s on either side of a fully involved one is an exposure problem.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
488
Yeah; That's Why I Added the Google Map 3D View
Refresh my memory, is it considered an exposure if it’s within 30ft of the fire bldg? If so, those driveways don‘t look 30ft wide from the Google photo & they should of then been reported in the initial size up,no?
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2018
Messages
3,413
Maybe,
E243, 284, 330, 253
L168, 149, 172F
B42, 43
S1
R5
D8
RAC5

E253 became available & added to Box
B33 unavailable (Box 7050)


20:56 hrs.: L168 gave 10-75, smoke in street

L172F

21:05 hrs.: B42 requested 2nd Alarm

2nd Alarm
Maybe,
E247, 242, 254, 245
L153, 161
B40 FF
B48 RUL
B58 S
E159 w/Sat. 5
FC, SB, RB, TSU1, CTU, RM

B42: fire 1st floor & top floor, 2 L/S/O

21:17 hrs: D8: Removing members from b'ldg., going to exterior attack

21:27 hrs: D8: roll call being conducted, 4 L/S/O

21:31 hrs.: D8 requested 3rd Alarm

Staging Area: Bath Av. & 21st Ave.

3rd Alarm
Maybe,
E310 act. 243, 224 act. 284, 323 act. 330, 250, 279 (Comm.)
L132 act. 168, 120 act. 172
B57 SA
B38 FF
B39 AirRecon (10-2)
MSU
RAC1
Car 24
Car 15A
Car 33
Car 22B
Car 23D

21:55 hrs.: FC; requested 4th Alarm as per D8

4th Alarm
E332 act. ?, 214 act. 247, 276, 318
L159 act. 153, 156, 101 act. 168 s/c, 107 act. 161 s/c
B35 FF
Car 4H
Car 4

21:58 hrs.: FC: Fire throughout 3 story vacant PD, 1 TL in operation & 6 L/S/O

22:16 hrs.: FC: Conditions remain the same, 1 TL in operation, 5 L/S/O, 1 Ladder pipe in operation

22:20 hrs.: FC: L153 will relieve L172 as FT

22:42 hrs.: FC: s/c (2) Trucks (L101 act. L168 & L 107 act. L161)

22:50 hrs.: FC: PWH

23:38 hrs.
: FC: UC as per D8 (duration 2 hr. 43 min.)

L132 act. L168
L101 act. L168

L108 act. L168
L120 act. L172
E323 act. E330

E210 act. E330
E236 act. E253
E303 act. E236
E230 act. E254
E281 act. E318
E310 act. E243
E224 act. E284
L107 act. L161

L112 act. L156
L159 act. L153
L158 act. L153
E214 act. E247
B35 act. B42
B2 act. B42
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 2, 2022
Messages
392
Refresh my memory, is it considered an exposure if it’s within 30ft of the fire bldg? If so, those driveways don‘t look 30ft wide from the Google photo & they should of then been reported in the initial size up,no?
Hmm.... I just posted what Div.8 Reported; you might have a point there.

Upon further review... If the Address & Google Photo are Correct - That Exp.3 / 3a Corner looks a Li'l Tricky
Looks Like: Some kinda' 1 Story Attached ? :unsure:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/1...2!3d40.6003647!4d-74.0011607!16s/g/11c2hh2_t9
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
9,383
Surprised 318/166 didn’t go earlier, 166 may not be 10-84 at all. Another example of the relocating companies being called sooner. 318/166 have a straight shot up Crospey Avenue, should be before 153 and 161 too id say.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
116
Surprised 318/166 didn’t go earlier, 166 may not be 10-84 at all. Another example of the relocating companies being called sooner. 318/166 have a straight shot up Crospey Avenue, should be before 153 and 161 too id say.
Don’t think 166 went at all. Pretty surprising because they have 2nd due and fast boxes only a few avenues down.
 
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
310
.
 

Attachments

  • E410019B-0C02-4ADE-BCD7-1F0689045968.jpeg
    E410019B-0C02-4ADE-BCD7-1F0689045968.jpeg
    209.8 KB · Views: 47
  • F016E10A-85CA-490B-B9EE-5D9125A59017.jpeg
    F016E10A-85CA-490B-B9EE-5D9125A59017.jpeg
    227.8 KB · Views: 46
  • 349A84BA-2768-4766-993E-FBEEA0B5673A.jpeg
    349A84BA-2768-4766-993E-FBEEA0B5673A.jpeg
    215.3 KB · Views: 44
  • A2E7EEBC-C10C-4F9E-B95A-C2780A7A8D6F.jpeg
    A2E7EEBC-C10C-4F9E-B95A-C2780A7A8D6F.jpeg
    290.7 KB · Views: 46
Top