Aerials Over 100 Feet ??

jlab

jlab

Joined
May 10, 2019
Messages
431
A while ago I saw some discussion somewhere about FDNY testing an aerial greater than 100 feet as they were thinking about how to handle a fire at St. Patrick's Cathedral after the fire at Notre Dame in Paris. Anyone know if this discussion/ planning is still active or has the concept been shelved ?
 
mikeindabronx

mikeindabronx

Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
28,205
135ft E-One, 4th photo down

http://taylorfire.tripod.com/new_page_4.htm

1983
95' platform and 135' aerial ladder are introduced.
In 1982, E-ONE introduced two new models in its highly acclaimed aerial series, the 95' platform and the 135' aerial ladder. These trucks further catered to firefighters' needs and gave E-ONE's aerials more capabilities than ever before.
 
Last edited:
X

XPFD3

Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
231
CFD Aerial Tower 8. 135' rear mount E-One aerial with a pre-piped waterway. Saw on another site that the apparatus struck a viaduct causing major damage to the ladder. Might have to go back to Ocala for replacement of the aerial device.
 
T

ta176

Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
273
When Capt. Vigiano was appointed to 176 it came up for discussion of obtaining a 125 Foot Rear mount. I argued 90% of our buildings are 3-5 stories so 125 foot wouldn't be better for us. The other side of the coin was that with the 125 footer all tormentors would have to be deployed when extending the aerial. The 100 footers we previously had only needed tormentors extended on the building side when using aerial ladder. So the other argument was that 100 footer was quicker to get into operation saving precious time in occupied buildings. Fortunately I won out and we settled on a 100 footer.
1 day we relocated to L 20 and we caught a job on the top floor of a 5 story loft. I set up aerial and had it fully extended to reach the 5th floor. Seeing this operation I could see where the 125 footer would be better in Manhattan.
By the way John was appointed to 176 in June 1990 when we were in the new house with 233 and CADO.
 
N

Nasibova

Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
930
ta176 said:
When Capt. Vigiano was appointed to 176 it came up for discussion of obtaining a 125 Foot Rear mount. I argued 90% of our buildings are 3-5 stories so 125 foot wouldn't be better for us. The other side of the coin was that with the 125 footer all tormentors would have to be deployed when extending the aerial. The 100 footers we previously had only needed tormentors extended on the building side when using aerial ladder. So the other argument was that 100 footer was quicker to get into operation saving precious time in occupied buildings. Fortunately I won out and we settled on a 100 footer.
1 day we relocated to L 20 and we caught a job on the top floor of a 5 story loft. I set up aerial and had it fully extended to reach the 5th floor. Seeing this operation I could see where the 125 footer would be better in Manhattan.
By the way John was appointed to 176 in June 1990 when we were in the new house with 233 and CADO.
Click to expand...
What make would they have been?
 
T

ta176

Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
273
As far as I knew it was to be a Seagrave who was making the 100 Footers at the time.
 
E

entropychaser

Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
1,012
I remember talking to some guys in midtown when they had the two high ladder units. They wondered who was going to climb up and operate at the very top. Seems to be an expensive toy. Below 100', overbuilt....above 135', useless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top