Battalion / Division Cars

Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
15,919
"Sorry, the page you were looking for in this blog does not exist. "

Way to go Bill-Here
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
606
Not sure what happened to it. As of the most recent photos seen B44 is running a 2011 Sierra with the standard set up.
 
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
15,562
I do'nt know if this was ever used on the Fire side....but back around 2012 when the photo first appeared i said "as a BN Rig this would be a bigger clunker than the Ford Excursion's were.... where did this wind up ?
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
6
I had heard talk of these rigs but never seen a rendering. Last I heard they decided against them but I’m unsure of the reason. With the recording equipment that is incorporated into the battalion vehicles there’s not much room for equipment. When battalions mentor captains or new battalion chiefs it’s a very tight squeeze to carry another person and their gear.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
53
Thats why they should give batt. Rigs like the ems paramedics have. With the box on back with all separate compartments
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
5
Thats why they should give batt. Rigs like the ems paramedics have. With the box on back with all separate compartments
Los Angeles City Fire attempted to do something similar, assigning their BCs rigs with compartmented bodies like that. It did not last long as they found it to be problematic, expensive, and far less useful than they originally expected.
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
1,190
Check these out
 

Attachments

  • 23e570320e64064af2102adb242605c3.jpg
    23e570320e64064af2102adb242605c3.jpg
    106.5 KB · Views: 41
  • d761a1de79b129a9cb8ecaa4ca0beb1f.jpg
    d761a1de79b129a9cb8ecaa4ca0beb1f.jpg
    224.9 KB · Views: 41
  • fl_miami_dade_battalion_9-1.jpg
    fl_miami_dade_battalion_9-1.jpg
    347.8 KB · Views: 40

dan

Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
128
The new standards from NFPA or whoever dictate that PPE needs to be stored separate from passenger compartment unless a rather cost prohibitive filtration system is installed in command and 1st response vehicles hence the reason for capped pickups and Sq51 type vehicles.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
483
The new standards from NFPA or whoever dictate that PPE needs to be stored separate from passenger compartment unless a rather cost prohibitive filtration system is installed in command and 1st response vehicles hence the reason for capped pickups and Sq51 type vehicles.

I have heard this stated a few times, but I have never seen anything legitimately written on this. I'm not looking to argue your post, I'm wondering if you saw this NFPA standard written or can give the NFPA statute number on this?
 
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
15,562
The new standards from NFPA or whoever dictate that PPE needs to be stored separate from passenger compartment unless a rather cost prohibitive filtration system is installed in command and 1st response vehicles hence the reason for capped pickups and Sq51 type vehicles.
So what about all the present Rigs in the FDNY ? how could this be practical ?
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
209
Could not locate anything in NFPA 1901 that refers to this requirement. Do you have a code reference available?
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
1,190
It’s called clean cab concept
So now guys are going to get out of the truck and have to stand in traffic to get and put on the SCBA not a smart move
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
483
It’s called clean cab concept
I understand the clean cab concept. My question was where is this written as an NFPA guideline? I hear a lot of people "quoting" NFPA mandates, but I don't see it written or an NFPA statute on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCR
Top