This was a row frame and not a non-fire proof MD, so such labelling would be inappropriate. But if it were a non-fire proof MD, it would be a NLT.Wouldn't this be considered a Old Law Tenement or do I have my years mixed up?
Old law was pre-1901.This was a row frame and not a non-fire proof MD, so such labelling would be inappropriate. But if it were a non-fire proof MD, it would be a NLT.
Old Law: 1901 - 1916
New Law: 1916 - 1929
Apartment House: 1929 -
That's on me, not paying attention while at the pool on vacation.Old law was pre-1901.
New Law was 1901-1929
The Tenement House Act of 1901 was passed in April, so 1901 may have had some Old Law buildings constructed before then.





removed or destroyed is more likely to collapse, due to the loss of the strutting effect of the other building/s. The buildings help hold each other up, especially when burning, or compromised by other structural damage. Last Photo below is of a Collapse I worked at on W. 31 St, in Manhattan. The adjoining building had been removed, the brick side wall bulged and collapse when untrained workers tried to remove bricks from the (Now fully exposed side wall) and the entire brick mixed occupancy building collapsed killing the owner and some of the workers.