Thinking the same thing, who’s going to be next Fire Commissioner!Should be no surprise, especially when a new Mayor is elected, there is a regime change at top levels. NYPD going through same thing, just unfortunate Chief Richardson only had short six months, but then again, he'll retire as COD.
Job could pick 1 of the top 3 on the listRemember when COD was a civil service test position and not a political appointment? Too bad FDNY got away from that.
It could happen but it's highly unlikely. There's that word "politics" that comes into play.He still has a chance to be commissioner or once he retired it's over?
Fingers are crossed but you can't read this guy Adams with his appointees.Lets hope he is appointed Fire Commissioner in the new mayoral administration change Chief of Department Thomas Richardson was a well respected and popular Chief of Department
But, we won't go there.Yes you can

TOM RICHARDSON....One of the Best....Great FF / Nozzleman....Great Boss..... Tom Enjoy a Long & Healthy Retirement you earned it.... Welcome to the "41 Year Club" ....no dues ...no meetings ....just Great Memories. ...... |
Walkout Ceremony Held For Retiring FDNY Chief Of Department Thomas RichardsonRichardson served 41 years with the FDNY.
|
He appointed then demoted then appointed his actual Brother (RET NYPD) to a $210,00. a yr position in charge of Mayoral Security Detail's.... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ssioner-deputy-director-mayoral-security.htmlFingers are crossed but you can't read this guy Adams with his appointees.
Good point.It's interesting that from the FDNY's establishment in 1865 until 1978 (about 113 years), 17 men were the Chief of Department.
Since 1978 (less than 44 years), 19 men have been the Chief (Frank Cruthers twice).
Soon there'll be the 20th.
The result has been rapid turnover. CODs and FCs have been changing too rapidly to have significant impacts. Change at top level also results in many high level staff changes. So turnovers become more than 1 person. Generally, frequent turnover is not positive for most organizations. Leaders are appointed and can already see their retirements and departures in the near future. I suspect new appointees are more likely to focus on political priorities which can quickly gain headlines rather than longer operational, facilities, communications, training and health issues which they will not be around for implementation or completion. You can't have consistent and effective long term vision or planning when you know you are in charge for 12 months.Chief of Department was Civil Service. Once granted tenure, they could not be removed. Once the 1990's (esp) rolled around, the Commissioner would get rid of the C of D so they would not be granted tenure. Basically, City Hall wanted to be able to control that spot.
I was reading about NYPD Commissioner Sewell. At the time of her appointment, she was the Chief of Detectives in Nassau County. In their Chain of Command, that appears to be a 3-star Chief, one rank below their COD. I don't know anything of her leadership style or politics. and I know NYPD is much larger than NCPD, but I don't necessarily think I'd say Sewell was completely green?The recent tragic Bronx 5th Alarm hopefully might impact leadership selections for FDNY. NYC has a new mayor who was a career cop, with limited senior management experience. He has just picked a NYPD Commissioner with no department leadership experience to lead a 55,000 member police department. Maybe he believed his own NYPD career will mitigate the limited credentials of his police commissioner. But leadership of the fire department is very different. Following the terrible loss of life at a fire, maybe he will recognize fire experience is important. Maybe he will appreciate extensive FDNY fire experience and job knowledge available in the many senior FDNY fire officers, both active and retired, who would make a competent Commissioner and a good COD. Maybe he will select candidates who have proven themselves with up-through-the-ranks successful leadership. If he wants his administration to be successful, he can't take too many risks that might gain headlines but result in unnecessary learning headaches. He may take a lot more time with interim FDNY leadership before deciding and announcing replacements.