EMT Sergeant

L

Lebby

Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
1,482
The department has been in talks with the union to bring back EMT Lieutenants for administrative duties (currently all, but a few grandfathered Lieutenants are paramedics). Apparently as they will be paid different to reflect their different level of certification there is a desire for them to have a different title as to avoid any confusion with their paramedic trained counterparts. Last night it was said at the union meeting they'll tentatively be called Sergeants.

I wonder if they'll wear sergeant stripes...
 
Capttomo

Capttomo

Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Messages
2,061
There are a few remaining fire departments that still have sargeants as a company officer rank. If I remember correctly one of the Maryland counties still utilize that rank.
 
E

entropychaser

Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
1,182
Capttomo said:
There are a few remaining fire departments that still have sargeants as a company officer rank. If I remember correctly one of the Maryland counties still utilize that rank.
Click to expand...
Also in Virginia and DCFD? Didn't the old fire patrols have that rank too?
 
lfdlt31

lfdlt31

Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
252
I believe most of the FD's that use the rank of Sgt use them as Firefighters eligible to act in the place of the company Lieutenant
 
E

Elmerj

Joined
May 6, 2021
Messages
94
Many questions with this one ...Seems like this would be departing from what is an industry standard in this country. Why would you want to reduce the level of education for supervision ? If I remember correctly the job required the medic cert to promote starting in 2009 specifically to have a better educated more capable supervisor/officer. It's been working for over a decade, why undo something that works ? What is the pay difference going to be and would it be more worthwhile to just go to the free (but you really need to study and apply yourself) FDNY medic training, get the cert, do some ALS street time and promote to Lieutenant. Seems like the only difference being floated here is the certification level. Would a Sgt. subsequently earning the medic cert allow them to become a lieutenant without another civil service exam ? How many seats would be set aside in Medic School for Sgts. who want to upgrade ? Who would Sgts. supervise ? The EMT's only ? Would they be permitted to supervise the Medics ? I think changing the supervision requirement to only a BLS cert would create too many opportunities for situations that were common in the past.

On the surface it seems like a reasonable opportunity for the EMT's to advance in rank. IMO the better (different) idea is to educationally prep those who want to advance so they are successful in Medic school. Could also do incremental certification from EMT to AEMT3 then to AEMT4 Paramedic for those who can't commit to the year in school up front. Is the forgivable loan program still around so EMT's can go to medic school on the outside and only be required to do the Medic Upgrade Program ? My thought would be to learn the whole job (both certification levels) be proficient, then take the Lieutenants exam enabling one to supervise everyone in the system on the street or otherwise without question.
More education not less.
 
M

MagicMan17

Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
128
The idea of allowing FDNY EMTs the opportunity to have more training and responsibilities as an A-EMT is something that I would support. I feel many FDNY EMTs feel a lack of pride in themselves because of how basic the job may feel most of the time. The skill set and knowledge difference of an EMT to a Paramedic is huge, as 9 months of additional (difficult) training is required to become a FDNY paramedic. This leaves many EMTs, especially those who aren’t committing a career to EMS (a lot of young people looking to promote to fire) intimidated by the commitment required to become a medic. However, an A-EMT status would allow young motivated EMTs the opportunity to practice more advanced medical skills without as much commitment and responsibility. As for the actual practical implementation of this program, that would be a whole other conversation.
 
L

Lebby

Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
1,482
It seems to be geared more so to administrative positions, especially EMTs like senior instructors or members involved in logistics who are supervising other EMTs.
 
D

dan

Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
137
This is strictly an administrative non operations and non patient care spot for the EMT's who want to be promoted......Same civil service test but different job duties as a Paramedic boss....pretty much a done deal.....When former NYPD brass are running the show you get PD rank and structure.....
 
E

Elmerj

Joined
May 6, 2021
Messages
94
Im trying to understand how you can give the same civil service test for two separate civil service titles with different job responsibilities. Are you suggesting the titles would be broad banded similar to what is done now with SEMSS 1 (Lieutenant) and SEMSS 2 (Captain) adding the Seargent position? As far as a done deal, when you get a city agency in this case the FDNY, Unions, OMB, OLR, DCAS & City Hall involved suddenly things that appear to be a done deal can sometimes take unanticipated twist and turns. Either way best of luck to all those who will benefit from the proposed new title.
 
SKuhrEM

SKuhrEM

Joined
Mar 23, 2023
Messages
1
Lebby said:
The department has been in talks with the union to bring back EMT Lieutenants for administrative duties (currently all, but a few grandfathered Lieutenants are paramedics). Apparently as they will be paid different to reflect their different level of certification there is a desire for them to have a different title as to avoid any confusion with their paramedic trained counterparts. Last night it was said at the union meeting they'll tentatively be called Sergeants.

I wonder if they'll wear sergeant stripes...
Click to expand...
EMS had a sergeant program which was tested in Manhattan in the late 80's, early 90's. A few worked in the borough command but I do not recall them on field or station duty. The program never grew legs.
 
F

fltpara16

Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
244
The small Department in Virginia I started with had Sergeants. When I was hired, the Department only had 22 personnel and the Officers included a Chief, two Lts. And a Fire Inspector. As the Department grew, there was a need for more officers to maintain the span of control. The City Manager at the time would only approve more fire officers if the ranks were the same as the Police Department. The Fire Department ended up with Corporals, Sergeants, Lieutenants and Captains. Eventually, after I went to another agency, the ranks were redesignated as LT., Capt., and Battalion Chief. My old Sgts. helmet is pictured below in retirement.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0111.jpeg
    IMG_0111.jpeg
    302.5 KB · Views: 4
Darrell

Darrell

Joined
Mar 30, 2023
Messages
713
Question, anyone remember when the FDNY came out and said EMS was getting a Sergeants rank? Did DCAS even give the written exams for it or did the new rank spark fizzle out?
 
L

Lebby

Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
1,482
Darrell said:
Question, anyone remember when the FDNY came out and said EMS was getting a Sergeants rank? Did DCAS even give the written exams for it or did the new rank spark fizzle out?
Click to expand...
The test was a few weeks ago
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top