That seems to go good so far, there's a 5+ minute video also.Madison has had an electric pumper since 2021.
It would certainly be interesting to hear 1 of the members who is assigned to the rig tell us what he thinks of it in day-to-day operation.Madison has had an electric pumper since 2021.
Right ? l almost wish in cases like this that the manufacturers would make one to specs for a few departments that would try it and just give it to them.THANK YOU "Nasibova" for this video.
'' One thing that he did NOT mention was cost.
He DID mention the savings on fuel, BUT he did NOT mention the cost of the apparatus, and Especially the INITAL COST to set up that entire new charging system.
Also what is the cost of the electric bill for that particular firehouse.
ELECTRIC Fire Trucks could very well be worth while in the future.
But I think we need more PROOF in about a year or so, in order to find out how well things are going.
One year from now, a full report would be welcomed. ''
I like your idea but, it's obvious that somebody would have to pay for them so guess who that somebody would be. It would either be the government which would take the money out of taxpayers or it would be other departments in the cost of conventional apparatus that they purchase. I think the departments that want to experiment with electric fire trucks should take the cost out of their budgets not somebody else's!Right ? l almost wish in cases like this that the manufacturers would make one to specs for a few departments that would try it and just give it to them.
Oh, l agree with that also, but just saying, if they gonna force this anyway in a few years. Yes, all these greenies pushing this agenda should have to pay for the samples / prototypes ... l'm 100 % fine with staying all fossil fuels.I like your idea but, it's obvious that somebody would have to pay for them so guess who that somebody would be. It would either be the government which would take the money out of taxpayers or it would be other departments in the cost of conventional apparatus that they purchase. I think the departments that want to experiment with electric fire trucks should take the cost out of their budgets not somebody else's!
Does anyone know who bought the 2nd one? Also does anyone have any information about how much they cost?I saw on another site that Pierce has sold the third Volterra electric fire truck to the Gilbert, Arizona Fire Department.
That, as stated, and they are all competing with each other too get a footprint in the market. So they can all claim they are eco friendly.You would think that electric fire vehicle manufacturers - there are only a few - would want to field test, discover problems, demonstrate advantages, determine maintenance policies, instill confidence and make improvements in a variety of climates, environments, department sizes, operations, etc. Why wouldn't they supply test apparatus to various departments which could train on and use these units safely as second pieces, or training-only environments to provide real world testing? Maybe because they don't have to.
I suspect rather than a technical, methodical and low risk introductory approach to the fire service, they are counting on already existing political pressure to be first, commit first, buy first, announce first. Electric vehicles and apparatus have futures to varying degrees in the fire service but safety, learning, continued development, and introduction due diligence are more important than headlines. Do it right.
Should we start a pool on which firehouse is severely damaged by a battery induced fire firstMadison, Wisconsin (#1), Portland, Oregon (#2), Gilbert, Arizona (#3).
"In Executive Order 90, NYC commits to electrifying its fleet. Light, medium, and non-emergency vehicles will electrify by 2035 and emergency and specialized trucks by 2040."